Australian cricket stars facing axe following loss to Bangladesh

Following Australia’s disastrous loss to Bangladesh over the weekend, all eyes have now turned to the Australian cricket team to see whether a reshuffle will take place.

Commentators have hinted at the axing of Jake Weatherald and Marnus Labuschagne and the return of Matt Renshaw as one possibility.

Matt Renshaw was parachuted into Australia’s set-up back in late January when Matt Short was dumped from the Aussies’ Twenty20 World Cup squad.

Back then, Australia had to comply with ICC* squad deadlines around global events.

This time, as Pat Cummins noted in his post-match press conference after Sunday’s Test disaster in Darwin, there are no such restrictions. Australia can call upon anyone, provided they are Australian.

The inclusion of Renshaw at Short’s expense shows this panel is willing to change direction and make unforced changes, even having declared other plans.

When Cricket Australia last month announced its streamlined* 13-man squad to face Bangladesh, it clearly said that this was the squad for both the Darwin and Mackay Tests.

The only other batter in the squad who didn’t make the Darwin team was Josh Inglis, not really an option at the top of the order in red-ball* cricket.

It really looked like Jake Weatherald would be given the chance to play at least two matches to try to strengthen his Test spot. And that probably would have been the case had Australia done as was widely expected and beat a Bangladesh team that had lost both of its last two red-ball matches – to Zimbabwe and a Cricket Australia XI – by an innings*.

But clearly all bets are off now.

Losing to the Tigers by nine wickets in a Test at home is as grim a result as Australia has had in international cricket. Ever.

In fact, Courier Mail senior sports journalist Robert Craddock described the thumping as “both the greatest upset in Test history and the most humbling Test loss ever suffered by an Australian cricket team.”

“Australia’s cricket landscape could be blown up and reshaped … all through the work of a team we refused to host for two decades because they weren’t up to our standard,” he wrote in an opinion piece for the Courier Mail.

The panel can’t afford to get too cute this week because the only thing worse than losing 1-0 to Bangladesh is losing 2-0.

Weatherald made it to his home Test in Darwin but his nervy 23 on day one and second innings duck* have left him vulnerable to being replaced given he averages just 20.36 through six Tests, small numbers compared to previous options Marcus Harris and Cameron Bancroft.

After a strong home season and some important national team white-ball* contributions this year, Renshaw coming in for Weatherald is the most obvious change Australia could make to its batting.

With Cameron Green ending debate around his spot with a breakthrough home Test ton*, Marnus Labuschagne is the other batter potentially in the gun.

There is a bit of the Mandela Effect* around selectors’ patience with Labuschagne. While he was given plenty of opportunities across 2024 and the first half of 2025, the Queenslander was eventually dropped for the series in the West Indies only to return for the Ashes.

Unless selectors go left-field and try Cooper Connolly up the order, Kurtis Patterson and Nathan McSweeney would be the two frontrunners to take Labuschagne’s spot at first drop.

Yet while both have had their moments over the past 12 months, neither man has scored high-enough level runs to justify taking over from Labuschagne, which is part of why the panel went back to him in the first place.

For that reason Labuschagne is likelier than Weatherald to get one more go in Mackay. Getting to South Africa for the series in October may be a different matter though.

That it was Green who provided Australia’s standout showing with the bat in Darwin should serve as a reminder that often youth – even the precocious* – can take years to find their best, even if fast-tracked. The problem is Australia doesn’t have years though. It has legacy-shaping tours of South Africa, India and England on the horizon.

This is the conundrum as the panel ponders whether to introduce the next generation of batters: Connolly, Sam Konstas, Campbell Kellaway, Ollie Peake, and why A-tours and one-dayers have been used to develop talent.

POLL

GLOSSARY

• ICC: International Cricket Council, the administrative body for cricket which runs world cricket tournaments
• streamlined: organised to work better by making it simple yet effective
• red-ball: used in test matches
• innings: one phase of the game where one team is batting and the other is bowling and fielding
• duck: a dismissal where the batter is out without scoring any runs
• white-ball: used in T20 and ODIs
• ton: a century, 100 or more runs scored by a single batter in a single innings
• Mandela Effect: a trick of the mind where a large group of people share the same false memory of a past event, so named after Nelson Mandela after it was popularly believed he died in prison in the 1980s when he was actually released in the 1990s and lived until 2013
• precocious: showing mental skills and development or maturity much younger than usual

EXTRA READING
Bradman’s rare cap sells for $460k
Top controversies to hit the Ashes
Pat Cummins feeds his inner child

QUICK QUIZ
1. Why was Australia’s defeat to Bangladesh so shocking?
2. By how many wickets did Australia lose by?
3. Which Australian cricketers are now in doubt ahead of the second test match?
4. Who could be a possible replacement?
5. How did Cameron Green end debate about his spot?

LISTEN TO THIS STORY

CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES
1. Cricket selection panel
You and a classmate have been given the job of selecting the team for the next test match in Mackay.

You need to choose a 13 player squad from all the cricketers mentioned in the article.

You need to justify your choices by using the following criteria;

• Recent performance
• Experience
• Future potential

Present your squad to another pair of selectors and see if your squad matched or differed on certain players or criteria.

Time: allow 25 minutes to complete this activity
Curriculum Links: English, Health and Physical Education, Personal and Social, Critical and Creative Thinking

2. Extension
“Should one poor performance be enough to lose your place in an international sporting team?”

What other things need to be considered when selecting an international sporting team?

Time: allow 10 minutes to complete this activity
Curriculum Links: English, Health and Physical Education, Personal and Social, Critical and Creative Thinking

VCOP ACTIVITY
Imaginative dialogue
Imagine you were there during the event being discussed in the article, or for the interview.

Create a conversation between two characters from the article – you may need or want to include yourself as one of the characters. Don’t forget to try to use facts and details from the article to help make your dialogue as realistic as possible.

Go through your writing and highlight any punctuation you have used in green. Make sure you carefully check the punctuation used for the dialogue and ensure you have opened and closed the speaking in the correct places.